Creagri, Inc. v. Pinnaclife, Inc.
This text of Creagri, Inc. v. Pinnaclife, Inc. (Creagri, Inc. v. Pinnaclife, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
CREAGRI, INC., a California Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
PINNACLIFE INC., a Nevada Corporation, Defendant-Appellee. ______________________
2014-1209 ______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in No. 5:11-cv-06635-LHK, Magistrate Judge Paul S. Grewal. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
PAUL J. ANDRE, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, of Menlo Park, California, argued for plaintiff- appellant. With him on the brief were LISA KOBIALKA and HANNAH LEE.
K. LEE MARSHALL, Bryan Cave LLP, of San Francisco, California, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief were BERRIE R. GOLDMAN and TRACY M. TALBOT. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (MOORE, REYNA, and CHEN, Circuit Judg- es). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
October 15, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Creagri, Inc. v. Pinnaclife, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/creagri-inc-v-pinnaclife-inc-cafc-2014.