Creager v. Bryan

287 F. 362, 1922 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1068
District Court, S.D. Texas·Decided October 23, 1922·No. No. 197·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause coming on to be heard on the application of the complainants therein for the issuance of a preliminary injunction pursuant to the prayer of the bill, upon consideration, the court being of opinion that it is without jurisdiction to grant the relief prayed for, which is in effect the issuance of a writ of mandamus (Knapp v. Lake Shore Ry. Co., 197 U. S. 536, 25 Sup. Ct. 538, 49 L. Ed. 870; Rosenbaum v. Bauer, 120 U. S. 450, 7 Sup. Ct. 633, 30 L. Ed. 743), the application for the preliminary relief sought is denied.

Because of the above-stated conclusion, it is deemed unnecessary to pass upon other considerations advanced in behalf of the defendants against the granting of the relief sought.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Creager v. Bryan, 287 F. 362, 1922 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1068 (S.D. Tex. 1922).

287 F. 362 (Creager v. Bryan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hurt v. Cotton States Fertilizer Co.
159 F.2d 52 (Fifth Circuit, 1947)
Bullard v. Selective Service Local Board
50 F. Supp. 192 (W.D. Oklahoma, 1943)
John C. Winston Co. v. Vaughan
11 F. Supp. 954 (W.D. Oklahoma, 1935)
Stevens v. Brookhaven Municipal Separate School Dist.
5 F. Supp. 629 (S.D. Mississippi, 1934)
Stevenson v. Holstein-Friesian Ass'n of America
30 F.2d 625 (Second Circuit, 1929)
Herkness v. Irion
11 F.2d 386 (E.D. Louisiana, 1926)
Fineran v. Bailey
2 F.2d 363 (Fifth Circuit, 1924)