Creach v. Creach

516 So. 2d 1060, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2869, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11594, 1987 WL 2700
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 15, 1987·No. No. 87-1414·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We agree with the appellant wife that the trial court abused its discretion in granting the ex-husband unsupervised visitation of their child. It is uncontroverted that the ex-husband had no contact with [1061]*1061the child from birth through the first three years. The court refused to receive any testimony regarding the ex-husband’s present condition or his level of rehabilitation from drug and alcohol abuse. We, accordingly, reverse the order permitting unsupervised visitation and direct the trial court to conduct an evidentiary hearing on this issue. See Gavronsky v. Gavronsky, 403 So.2d 627 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981); Baker v. Baker, 377 So.2d 776 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979); Adams v. Adams, 376 So.2d 1204 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), cert. denied, 388 So.2d 1109 (Fla.1980).

Reversed and remanded with directions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Creach v. Creach, 516 So. 2d 1060, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2869, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11594, 1987 WL 2700 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

516 So. 2d 1060 (Creach v. Creach) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hunter v. Hunter
540 So. 2d 235 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)