Creach v. Creach

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Creach v. Creach

516 So. 2d 1060, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2869, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11594, 1987 WL 2700

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 15, 1987

DocketNo. 87-1414

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 516 So. 2d 1060 (Creach v. Creach) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Creach v. Creach, 516 So. 2d 1060, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2869, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11594, 1987 WL 2700 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We agree with the appellant wife that the trial court abused its discretion in granting the ex-husband unsupervised visitation of their child. It is uncontroverted that the ex-husband had no contact with [1061]*1061the child from birth through the first three years. The court refused to receive any testimony regarding the ex-husband’s present condition or his level of rehabilitation from drug and alcohol abuse. We, accordingly, reverse the order permitting unsupervised visitation and direct the trial court to conduct an evidentiary hearing on this issue. See Gavronsky v. Gavronsky, 403 So.2d 627 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981); Baker v. Baker, 377 So.2d 776 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979); Adams v. Adams, 376 So.2d 1204 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), cert. denied, 388 So.2d 1109 (Fla.1980).

Reversed and remanded with directions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We agree with the appellant wife that the trial court abused its discretion in granting the ex-husband unsupervised visitation of their child. It is uncontroverted that the ex-husband had no contact with [1061]*1061the child from birth through the first three years. The court refused to receive any testimony regarding the ex-husband’s present condition or his level of rehabilitation from drug and alcohol abuse. We, accordingly, reverse the order permitting unsupervised visitation and direct the trial court to conduct an evidentiary hearing on this issue. See Gavronsky v. Gavronsky, 403 So.2d 627 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981); Baker v. Baker, 377 So.2d 776 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979); Adams v. Adams, 376 So.2d 1204 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), cert. denied, 388 So.2d 1109 (Fla.1980).

Reversed and remanded with directions.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

516 So. 2d 1060, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2869, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11594, 1987 WL 2700, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/creach-v-creach-fladistctapp-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack