Crayton v. Larabee
This text of 162 A.D. 934 (Crayton v. Larabee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Held, first, that the defendant’s motion for a nonsuit and dismissal of the complaint was properly denied; second, that the question of the power of the health officer to quarantine the plaintiff if he acted in good faith and had reasonable cause to believe that the plaintiff was infected and liable to communicate disease to others, was not raised at the trial by any exception to the charge or otherwise. All concurred, except Merrell, J., who dissented upon the ground that while the question referred to was not properly raised, this court has the power to, and should, pass upon that question.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
162 A.D. 934, 147 N.Y.S. 1105, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crayton-v-larabee-nyappdiv-1914.