Craycroft's Adm'r v. Clay's Admr.
10 Ky. Op. 479, 1880 Ky. LEXIS 157
Opinion
Opinion by
An administrator de bonis non cannot maintain an action against his predecessor in office for a devastavit, or for a settlement. Such actions can only be maintained by a creditor or distributee. Felts v. Brown, 7 J. J. Marsh. 147; Lawrence’s Adm’r v. Lawrence, Litt. Sec. Cas., 123; Warfield v. Brand, 13 Bush 77.
As the appellant had no right to maintain, the action his rights were not prejudiced by its dismission.
Judgment affirmed..
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Craycroft's Adm'r v. Clay's Admr., 10 Ky. Op. 479, 1880 Ky. LEXIS 157 (Ky. Ct. App. 1880).
10 Ky. Op. 479 (Craycroft's Adm'r v. Clay's Admr.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Warfield v. Brand's adm'r
76 Ky. 77 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1877)