Craycroft v. Superior Court

137 P. 264, 23 Cal. App. 182, 1913 Cal. App. LEXIS 167
CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal
DecidedNovember 6, 1913
DocketCiv. No. 1394.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 137 P. 264 (Craycroft v. Superior Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Craycroft v. Superior Court, 137 P. 264, 23 Cal. App. 182, 1913 Cal. App. LEXIS 167 (Cal. Ct. App. 1913).

Opinion

SHAW, J.

This is an application for a writ of prohibition to be directed to the superior court of Kern County and the judges thereof, prohibiting the said court from proceeding with the trial of a certain action pending therein, wherein Charles Smithwick is plaintiff and petitioners and others are *183 defendants. The subject of the action is the conflicting claims of the respective parties to the right to purchase from the state certain school lands described in the petition over which a contest arose in the office of the state surveyor-general and register of the state land-office, which contest was by order duly made referred for-adjudication to said court.

The facts upon which this proceeding is based are, except as to some of the parties and the particular description of the land, identical with those involved in the case of Craycroft Jr., v. Superior Court of Kern County, decided by this court and reported in 18 Cal. App. 781, [124 Pac. 1042], wherein a writ of prohibition was ordered. Upon the authority of that case and for the reasons set forth in the opinion filed therein, it is clear that a peremptory writ of prohibition should issue in accordance with the prayer of the petition; and it is so ordered.

Conrey, P. J., and James, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jacoby v. Peck
138 P. 104 (California Court of Appeal, 1913)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
137 P. 264, 23 Cal. App. 182, 1913 Cal. App. LEXIS 167, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/craycroft-v-superior-court-calctapp-1913.