Craycroft v. Crawford

287 S.W. 244
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Craycroft v. Crawford. Read the opinion of the Court — 285 S.W. 275
Texas Commission of Appeals·Decided October 27, 1926·No. Motion No. 7192; No. 809-4472·Published

Opinion

NICKELS, J.

We have carefully considered all matters presented in the motion for rehearing filed by defendants in error in the cause, and, in our opinion, nothing is presented which discloses any material error.

In subdivision 6, p. 10, of our original opinion (285 S. W. 280), this statement is made:1

“It [i. e. the will] had no attestation and (in the probate) it was not proved otherwise than by identification of the handwriting.”

We have determined that the reference to what was proved “in the probate” is without support in the record, and we desire to modify the opinion to the extent of omitting that reference. This error, however, seems to us to he immaterial.

We recommend that the motion for rehearing be overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Craycroft v. Crawford, 287 S.W. 244 (Tex. Super. Ct. 1926).

287 S.W. 244 (Craycroft v. Crawford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Craycroft v. Crawford
285 S.W. 275 (Texas Commission of Appeals, 1926)