Crawley v. State
539 So. 2d 1162, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 657, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1223, 1989 WL 20099
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 8, 1989
DocketNo. 87-767
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases
This text of 539 So. 2d 1162 (Crawley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Crawley v. State, 539 So. 2d 1162, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 657, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1223, 1989 WL 20099 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).
Opinion
The appellant’s contention that he was misadvised as to the consequences of his nolo contendere plea is not properly presented in a direct appeal; it should be raised in the trial court on a motion to withdraw the plea or a motion to vacate pursuant to rule 3.850 of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.
The appeal is dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
McCarty v. State
608 So. 2d 585 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Strong v. State
555 So. 2d 950 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Ponderosa, Inc. v. Stephens
539 So. 2d 1162 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
539 So. 2d 1162, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 657, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1223, 1989 WL 20099, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crawley-v-state-fladistctapp-1989.