Crawley v. State
539 So. 2d 1162, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 657, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1223, 1989 WL 20099
Opinion
The appellant’s contention that he was misadvised as to the consequences of his nolo contendere plea is not properly presented in a direct appeal; it should be raised in the trial court on a motion to withdraw the plea or a motion to vacate pursuant to rule 3.850 of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.
The appeal is dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Crawley v. State, 539 So. 2d 1162, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 657, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1223, 1989 WL 20099 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).
539 So. 2d 1162 (Crawley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
McCarty v. State
608 So. 2d 585 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Strong v. State
555 So. 2d 950 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Ponderosa, Inc. v. Stephens
539 So. 2d 1162 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)