Crawley v. Richmond & Danville Railroad

70 Miss. 340
Mississippi Supreme Court·Decided October 15, 1892·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Campbell, C. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

It is so clear that the unfortunate man who was killed contributed directly to his own death by his incautious and reckless action, that, the coui’t properly told the jury the plaintiff was not entitled to recover.

[344] It is true that the defendant was guilty of a violation of law in the rate of speed at which the train was run, but this was causa sine qua non, while the causa causans was the imprudence of the person killed, so unmistakable as to authorize the assertion that he was the cause of his death.

We sympathize tenderly with the mother, who, in the death of her son, lost her means of support, but have no authority to serve her by permitting any relaxation of the rules of law in her favor.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Crawley v. Richmond & Danville Railroad, 70 Miss. 340 (Mich. 1892).

70 Miss. 340 (Crawley v. Richmond & Danville Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Yazoo M.V.R. Co. v. Green
147 So. 333 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1933)
Morrison v. Lee
133 N.W. 548 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1911)
Jackson v. Mobile & Ohio Railroad
42 So. 236 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1906)
Clisby v. Mobile & Ohio Railroad
78 Miss. 937 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1901)
Meyer v. King
35 L.R.A. 474 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1894)