Crawley v. Richardson

Supreme Court of Georgia

Crawley v. Richardson

78 Ga. 213

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedDecember 21, 1886

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 78 Ga. 213 (Crawley v. Richardson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Crawley v. Richardson, 78 Ga. 213 (Ga. 1886).

Pincite

Opinion

Blandford, Justice.

This was an action to recover a certain tract or parcel of land in the town of Covington, Newton county. It was shown that one Hyer owned this land. He made a deed to one undivided two-thirds interest in the same to John C. Nichols and Vm. Graves. A partnership was after-wards formed between Hyer, Nichols and Graves, and a shop was placed upon the land by the firm. Graves made his will in 1863, and by the same conveyed all his property to Ellen J. Crawley, in trust for the separate and sole use of Charles B. Crawley, the plaintiff; and if said Charles B. should die before he arrived at twenty-one years, it was provided that his mother, Ellen J. Crawley, should have the use of the same for her life, and after her death the same was to go to Byrnes and Youngkins, his friends. Graves died soon after the making of the will. John C. Nichols, after the death of Hyer and Graves, as sole surviving partner of Hyer, Nichols & Graves, sold the land to Mary Nichols, in 1868, and the same was regularly conveyed to Richardson, trustee, the defendant; and there had been more than seven years’ adverse possession in Richardson, and those under whom he claims, before the commencement of this action.

Did the will of Vm. Graves create an executory trust in Ellen J. Crawley for plaintiff? If it did, then the plaintiff could not recover; otherwise, he could recover. The' whole property, by the will, was devised to Ellen J. Crawley in trust for Charles B. Crawley, and if he died before twenty-one, she was to have the use of it for life, and then it was to go to his friends. This was a trust in Ellen J. during the minority of Charles B.; it was executory, that [215]*215is, continuing until he attained liis majority; and there being a right of action in the trustee to recover this property, the prescription ran against the trustee, and as she was barred before plaintiff became of age, he was likewise barred, the prescription being complete. So that the verdict is right, and under the facts, no judgment could be had for plaintiff.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Blandford, Justice.

This was an action to recover a certain tract or parcel of land in the town of Covington, Newton county. It was shown that one Hyer owned this land. He made a deed to one undivided two-thirds interest in the same to John C. Nichols and Vm. Graves. A partnership was after-wards formed between Hyer, Nichols and Graves, and a shop was placed upon the land by the firm. Graves made his will in 1863, and by the same conveyed all his property to Ellen J. Crawley, in trust for the separate and sole use of Charles B. Crawley, the plaintiff; and if said Charles B. should die before he arrived at twenty-one years, it was provided that his mother, Ellen J. Crawley, should have the use of the same for her life, and after her death the same was to go to Byrnes and Youngkins, his friends. Graves died soon after the making of the will. John C. Nichols, after the death of Hyer and Graves, as sole surviving partner of Hyer, Nichols & Graves, sold the land to Mary Nichols, in 1868, and the same was regularly conveyed to Richardson, trustee, the defendant; and there had been more than seven years’ adverse possession in Richardson, and those under whom he claims, before the commencement of this action.

Did the will of Vm. Graves create an executory trust in Ellen J. Crawley for plaintiff? If it did, then the plaintiff could not recover; otherwise, he could recover. The' whole property, by the will, was devised to Ellen J. Crawley in trust for Charles B. Crawley, and if he died before twenty-one, she was to have the use of it for life, and then it was to go to his friends. This was a trust in Ellen J. during the minority of Charles B.; it was executory, that [215]*215is, continuing until he attained liis majority; and there being a right of action in the trustee to recover this property, the prescription ran against the trustee, and as she was barred before plaintiff became of age, he was likewise barred, the prescription being complete. So that the verdict is right, and under the facts, no judgment could be had for plaintiff.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

78 Ga. 213, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crawley-v-richardson-ga-1886.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack