Crawford's Estate

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Crawford's Estate

17 Pa. Super. 170, 1901 Pa. Super. LEXIS 272

Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided May 23, 1901·No. Appeal, No. 36·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The able argument of the appellant’s counsel has failed to convince us that the court below committed error in the decision of either of the three questions presented for our consideration. The correctness of the conclusions reached is so fully vindicated in the auditor’s report and the opinion of the court overruling the exceptions thereto, as to render further discussion by us unnecessary.

The decree is affirmed and appeal dismissed at the cost of the appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

The able argument of the appellant’s counsel has failed to convince us that the court below committed error in the decision of either of the three questions presented for our consideration. The correctness of the conclusions reached is so fully vindicated in the auditor’s report and the opinion of the court overruling the exceptions thereto, as to render further discussion by us unnecessary.

The decree is affirmed and appeal dismissed at the cost of the appellant.

Crawford's Estate, 17 Pa. Super. 170, 1901 Pa. Super. LEXIS 272 (Pa. Ct. App. 1901).

Pincite

17 Pa. Super. 170 (Crawford's Estate) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related