Crawford v. West Virginia Dept. of Human Services

Fourth Circuit

Crawford v. West Virginia Dept. of Human Services

37 F.3d 1493, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 34808, 1994 WL 542802

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedOctober 6, 1994

Docket93-2065

StatusPublished

This text of 37 F.3d 1493 (Crawford v. West Virginia Dept. of Human Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Crawford v. West Virginia Dept. of Human Services, 37 F.3d 1493, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 34808, 1994 WL 542802 (4th Cir. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

37 F.3d 1493
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Roger L. CRAWFORD, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
WEST VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES; Joice Mann,
Hinton Agent; Barbara Gunnoe, Princeton Agent; Conrad
Hilton Foundation; Women's Resource Center, Glen White,
West Virginia; Carlotta Smith; Project Reachh; Loaves and
Fishes; Jane Duffield; Marie Madaringa; Peggie Rossi;
SBR, Incorporated, Parkersburg, West Virginia; Becky Jones,
of the Hinton Seven-Eleven Store; City of Hinton, West
Virginia; John Mann, Patrolman; Mrs. Crowder, Principal of
Hinton High School; County of Summers, amongst others in
concern therewith, Defendants Appellees.

No. 93-2065.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 5, 1994
Decided Oct. 6, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Beckley. Charles H. Haden II, Chief District Judge. (CA-92-406-5)

Roger L. Crawford, Appellant Pro Se.

Stephen Mark Fowler, Cleek, Pullin, Knopf & Fowler, Charleston, WV; Paul C. Camilletti, Camilletti, Sacco & Puzzuti, Wheeling, WV; William Edward Hamb, Hamb, Poffenbarger & Bailey, Charleston, WV, for Appellees.

S.D. W.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER, MURNAGHAN, and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record, the magistrate judge's report, the objections to the report, and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. As the magistrate judge stated, the action is frivolous. Accordingly, we affirm.* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

We note that the district court adopted the magistrate judge's report and recommendation notwithstanding the lack of timely objections. Even considering the objections as timely, the appeal has no merit

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

37 F.3d 1493
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Roger L. CRAWFORD, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
WEST VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES; Joice Mann,
Hinton Agent; Barbara Gunnoe, Princeton Agent; Conrad
Hilton Foundation; Women's Resource Center, Glen White,
West Virginia; Carlotta Smith; Project Reachh; Loaves and
Fishes; Jane Duffield; Marie Madaringa; Peggie Rossi;
SBR, Incorporated, Parkersburg, West Virginia; Becky Jones,
of the Hinton Seven-Eleven Store; City of Hinton, West
Virginia; John Mann, Patrolman; Mrs. Crowder, Principal of
Hinton High School; County of Summers, amongst others in
concern therewith, Defendants Appellees.

No. 93-2065.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 5, 1994
Decided Oct. 6, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Beckley. Charles H. Haden II, Chief District Judge. (CA-92-406-5)

Roger L. Crawford, Appellant Pro Se.

Stephen Mark Fowler, Cleek, Pullin, Knopf & Fowler, Charleston, WV; Paul C. Camilletti, Camilletti, Sacco & Puzzuti, Wheeling, WV; William Edward Hamb, Hamb, Poffenbarger & Bailey, Charleston, WV, for Appellees.

S.D. W.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER, MURNAGHAN, and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record, the magistrate judge's report, the objections to the report, and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. As the magistrate judge stated, the action is frivolous. Accordingly, we affirm.* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

We note that the district court adopted the magistrate judge's report and recommendation notwithstanding the lack of timely objections. Even considering the objections as timely, the appeal has no merit

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

37 F.3d 1493, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 34808, 1994 WL 542802, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crawford-v-west-virginia-dept-of-human-services-ca4-1994.