Crawford v. Turpin

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: May 20, 2004
• Docket: 04-6564
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-6564

PERRY L. CRAWFORD,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JAMES M. TURPIN; SUSAN MCNEELY; MARY STEINS,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; THE UTILIZATION REVIEW BOARD,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Graham C. Mullen, Chief District Judge. (CA-01-40-1)

Submitted: May 13, 2004 Decided: May 20, 2004

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Perry L. Crawford, Appellant Pro Se. Dana Hefter Davis, Raleigh, North Carolina; Roy Asberry Cooper III, Marry S. Mercer, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

- 2 - PER CURIAM:

Perry L. Crawford appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See

Crawford v. Turpin, No. CA-01-40-1 (W.D.N.C. Mar. 26, 2004). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 3 -