Crawford v. Township Boards of Scio & Webster
22 Mich. 405, 1871 Mich. LEXIS 43
Opinion
The Court held that the boards whose action is to be reviewed and in whose hands the record of that action remains, are proper parties defendant and must make the return to the writ; that upon the question of acquiescence of the plaintiff in error, in the proceedings of the district meeting, the affidavits are in conflict, and a further showing would not remove that conflict, and that the motion to dismiss can only be granted on that ground when the acquiescence is undisputed.
Motion denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Crawford v. Township Boards of Scio & Webster, 22 Mich. 405, 1871 Mich. LEXIS 43 (Mich. 1871).
22 Mich. 405 (Crawford v. Township Boards of Scio & Webster) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gilliam v. Etheridge
21 S.E.2d 556 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1942)
State ex rel. Brewster v. Mohler
158 P. 408 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1916)
In re the Application of Evingson
49 N.W. 733 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1891)
Wood v. Riddle
12 P. 385 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1886)
Simon v. Portland Common Council
9 Or. 437 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1881)
McGregor v. Board of Supervisors
37 Mich. 388 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1877)