Crawford v. Township Boards of Scio & Webster
This text of 22 Mich. 405 (Crawford v. Township Boards of Scio & Webster) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The Court held that the boards whose action is to be reviewed and in whose hands the record of that action remains, are proper parties defendant and must make the return to the writ; that upon the question of acquiescence of the plaintiff in error, in the proceedings of the district meeting, the affidavits are in conflict, and a further showing would not remove that conflict, and that the motion to dismiss can only be granted on that ground when the acquiescence is undisputed.
Motion denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
22 Mich. 405, 1871 Mich. LEXIS 43, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crawford-v-township-boards-of-scio-webster-mich-1871.