Crawford v. State

1911 OK CR 26, 113 P. 200, 5 Okla. Crim. 33, 1911 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 29
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided February 6, 1911·No. No. A-293.·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

FURMAN, PRESIDING Judge.

Appellant was indicted, charged with the offense of selling intoxicating liquors, and convicted by the jury. His punishment was assessed by the court at a fine of $250 and imprisonment in the county jail for a period of 60 days.

The only evidence introduced by the state was that the defendant had sold bitters. No proof was offered showing that the bitters sold by the defendant were intoxicating. Courts do not take judicial notice of the fact that bitters are intoxicating. The evidence is insufficient to sustain the verdict.

The judgment of the lower court is therefore reversed, with directions to the county attorney to dismiss this prosecution, unless he can prove that the bitters sold by the defendant to the prosecuting witness were intoxicating.

ARMSTRONG and DOYLE, Judges, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Crawford v. State, 1911 OK CR 26, 113 P. 200, 5 Okla. Crim. 33, 1911 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 29 (Okla. Ct. App. 1911).

1911 OK CR 26 (Crawford v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Peretto v. State
1925 OK CR 434 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1925)
Skelton v. State
1925 OK CR 276 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1925)