Crawford v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Crawford v. State

391 S.W.3d 928, 2013 WL 816045, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 292

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 5, 2013·No. No. WD 74720·Published

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM.

Taron Crawford appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion, following an evidentiary hearing. Crawford contends the motion court erred in ruling that defense counsel was not ineffective in failing to call Terrance Ruff as a witness at trial. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the judgment denying post-conviction relief.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order

PER CURIAM.

Taron Crawford appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion, following an evidentiary hearing. Crawford contends the motion court erred in ruling that defense counsel was not ineffective in failing to call Terrance Ruff as a witness at trial. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the judgment denying post-conviction relief.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).

Crawford v. State, 391 S.W.3d 928, 2013 WL 816045, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 292 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

391 S.W.3d 928 (Crawford v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.