Crawford v. State

Mississippi Supreme Court

Crawford v. State

134 So. 3d 307, 2014 WL 1457818, 2014 Miss. LEXIS 178

Mississippi Supreme Court·Decided April 1, 2014·No. No. 2013-DR-02147-SCT·Published

Opinions

EN BANC ORDER

This matter comes before the en banc Court on the State’s Motion to Disqualify [308] the Office of Capital Post-Conviction Counsel in this Case Because of a Conflict of Interest. After review, the Court has determined that the motion is not well taken and should be denied.

It is therefore ORDERED, that the State’s Motion to Disqualify the Office of Capital Post-Conviction Counsel in this Case Because of a Conflict of Interest is hereby denied.

SO ORDERED.

/s/ Jess H. Dickinson

JESS H. DICKINSON, PRESIDING JUSTICE

TO DENY: WALLER, C.J., DICKINSON, P.J., LAMAR, KITCHENS, KING AND COLEMAN, JJ. RANDOLPH, P.J., OBJECTS TO THE ORDER WITH SEPARATE WRITTEN STATEMENT JOINED BY CHANDLER AND PIERCE, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

EN BANC ORDER

This matter comes before the en banc Court on the State’s Motion to Disqualify [308] the Office of Capital Post-Conviction Counsel in this Case Because of a Conflict of Interest. After review, the Court has determined that the motion is not well taken and should be denied.

It is therefore ORDERED, that the State’s Motion to Disqualify the Office of Capital Post-Conviction Counsel in this Case Because of a Conflict of Interest is hereby denied.

SO ORDERED.

/s/ Jess H. Dickinson

JESS H. DICKINSON, PRESIDING JUSTICE

TO DENY: WALLER, C.J., DICKINSON, P.J., LAMAR, KITCHENS, KING AND COLEMAN, JJ. RANDOLPH, P.J., OBJECTS TO THE ORDER WITH SEPARATE WRITTEN STATEMENT JOINED BY CHANDLER AND PIERCE, JJ.

Crawford v. State, 134 So. 3d 307, 2014 WL 1457818, 2014 Miss. LEXIS 178 (Mich. 2014).

Pincite

134 So. 3d 307 (Crawford v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.