Crawford v. State

134 So. 3d 307, 2014 WL 1457818, 2014 Miss. LEXIS 178
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedApril 1, 2014
DocketNo. 2013-DR-02147-SCT
StatusPublished

This text of 134 So. 3d 307 (Crawford v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Crawford v. State, 134 So. 3d 307, 2014 WL 1457818, 2014 Miss. LEXIS 178 (Mich. 2014).

Opinions

EN BANC ORDER

This matter comes before the en banc Court on the State’s Motion to Disqualify [308]*308the Office of Capital Post-Conviction Counsel in this Case Because of a Conflict of Interest. After review, the Court has determined that the motion is not well taken and should be denied.

It is therefore ORDERED, that the State’s Motion to Disqualify the Office of Capital Post-Conviction Counsel in this Case Because of a Conflict of Interest is hereby denied.

SO ORDERED.

/s/ Jess H. Dickinson

JESS H. DICKINSON, PRESIDING JUSTICE

TO DENY: WALLER, C.J., DICKINSON, P.J., LAMAR, KITCHENS, KING AND COLEMAN, JJ. RANDOLPH, P.J., OBJECTS TO THE ORDER WITH SEPARATE WRITTEN STATEMENT JOINED BY CHANDLER AND PIERCE, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
134 So. 3d 307, 2014 WL 1457818, 2014 Miss. LEXIS 178, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crawford-v-state-miss-2014.