Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Crawford v. State

Crawford v. State

147 So. 3d 31, 2013 WL 5287906, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 14864
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 18, 2013
DocketNo. 1D12-4930
StatusPublished

This text of 147 So. 3d 31 (Crawford v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Crawford v. State, 147 So. 3d 31, 2013 WL 5287906, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 14864 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm without comment Crawford’s conviction and sentence for violation of youthful offender probation. We remand, however, for the sole purpose of having the trial court designate in Crawford’s judgment and sentence whether he maintains his youthful offender status. See Jacques v. State, 95 So.3d 419, 421 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012); Mistretta v. State, 99 So.3d 561, 562 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012). Crawford need not be present for the administrative task of correcting the sentence.

CLARK, ROWE, and SWANSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jacques v. State
95 So. 3d 419 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)
Mistretta v. State
99 So. 3d 561 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
147 So. 3d 31, 2013 WL 5287906, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 14864, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crawford-v-state-fladistctapp-2013.