Crawford v. State
147 So. 3d 31, 2013 WL 5287906, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 14864
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Crawford v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 20640 →
Opinion
We affirm without comment Crawford’s conviction and sentence for violation of youthful offender probation. We remand, however, for the sole purpose of having the trial court designate in Crawford’s judgment and sentence whether he maintains his youthful offender status. See Jacques v. State, 95 So.3d 419, 421 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012); Mistretta v. State, 99 So.3d 561, 562 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012). Crawford need not be present for the administrative task of correcting the sentence.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Crawford v. State, 147 So. 3d 31, 2013 WL 5287906, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 14864 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).
147 So. 3d 31 (Crawford v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Jacques v. State
95 So. 3d 419 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)
Mistretta v. State
99 So. 3d 561 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)