Crawford v. State
12 So. 3d 919, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 9513, 2009 WL 2004950
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Crawford v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 982 So. 2d 1 →
Opinion
In light of the insufficiency of the evidence presented by the prosecution to prove the commission of the two counts of grand theft of which the appellant was convicted, these convictions are reversed and this case is remanded to the trial court with directions that the appellant be discharged. See Martin v. State, 379 So.2d 179 (Fla. 1st DCA1980).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Crawford v. State, 12 So. 3d 919, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 9513, 2009 WL 2004950 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).
12 So. 3d 919 (Crawford v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Martin v. State
379 So. 2d 179 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)