Crawford v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Crawford v. State

494 So. 2d 311, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2037, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 9784

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 24, 1986

DocketNo. 83-1322

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 494 So. 2d 311 (Crawford v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Crawford v. State, 494 So. 2d 311, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2037, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 9784 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal has been reconsidered on remand from the supreme court. See Crawford v. State, 491 So.2d 1142 (Fla.1986).

We conclude that the error, discussed more fully by this court in Crawford v. State, 473 So.2d 700 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985), is harmless error. In determining that the error was harmless, we have applied the rigorous analysis required by State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla.1986), and find the state has met its burden in proving beyond a reasonable doubt that the error did not affect the verdict.

AFFIRMED.

DOWNEY, GLICKSTEIN and STONE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI