Crawford v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Crawford v. State

132 So. 181, 24 Ala. App. 179, 1931 Ala. App. LEXIS 187

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 20, 1931

Docket3 Div. 675.

StatusPublished

This text of 132 So. 181 (Crawford v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Crawford v. State, 132 So. 181, 24 Ala. App. 179, 1931 Ala. App. LEXIS 187 (Ala. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

PER. CURIAM.

Under the authority of the opinion in the case of Snead v. State, 18 Ala. App. 437, 93 So. 48, in connection with Code 1923, § 4166, we hold that petitioner was not entitled to his release at the time this petition was filed. However, the order of commitment, entered by the court, from which this appeal was taken, is erroneous, in that it does not comply with Code 1923, § 4168. And, under the authority of that same Code section it would appear, and we hold, that petitioner cannot be longer detained under this particular proceeding, unless, since the petition was first filed, the additional action contemplated has been taken under and in accordance with the provisions of said section.

The judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER. CURIAM.

Under the authority of the opinion in the case of Snead v. State, 18 Ala. App. 437, 93 So. 48, in connection with Code 1923, § 4166, we hold that petitioner was not entitled to his release at the time this petition was filed. However, the order of commitment, entered by the court, from which this appeal was taken, is erroneous, in that it does not comply with Code 1923, § 4168. And, under the authority of that same Code section it would appear, and we hold, that petitioner cannot be longer detained under this particular proceeding, unless, since the petition was first filed, the additional action contemplated has been taken under and in accordance with the provisions of said section.

The judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

132 So. 181, 24 Ala. App. 179, 1931 Ala. App. LEXIS 187, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crawford-v-state-alactapp-1931.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack