Crawford v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Crawford v. Smith

89 S.E. 1053, 18 Ga. App. 524, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 1090

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedSeptember 15, 1916

Docket7227

StatusPublished

This text of 89 S.E. 1053 (Crawford v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Crawford v. Smith, 89 S.E. 1053, 18 Ga. App. 524, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 1090 (Ga. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

Wade, C. J.

On April 17, 1914, judgment was rendered against the defendant, and on April 22, 1914, an execution issued thereon and was duly entered upon the general execution docket. On June 1, 1915, a certain horse in the possession of the defendant and held by him in his own name and right was traded by him to Crawford, and on October 4, 1915, the horse was levied ón in the possession of Crawford as the property of the defendant. A claim was interposed-by Crawford, and on the trial a verdict was directed in favor of the plaintiff. Held: There was no error in directing the verdict.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wade, C. J.

On April 17, 1914, judgment was rendered against the defendant, and on April 22, 1914, an execution issued thereon and was duly entered upon the general execution docket. On June 1, 1915, a certain horse in the possession of the defendant and held by him in his own name and right was traded by him to Crawford, and on October 4, 1915, the horse was levied ón in the possession of Crawford as the property of the defendant. A claim was interposed-by Crawford, and on the trial a verdict was directed in favor of the plaintiff. Held: There was no error in directing the verdict.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

89 S.E. 1053, 18 Ga. App. 524, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 1090, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crawford-v-smith-gactapp-1916.