Crawford v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
216 N.C. 789
Opinion
This appeal presents no new question of law. The rules which relate to the right of removal from the State court to District Court of the United States are stated in Crisp v. Fibre Co., 193 N. C., 77, 136 S. E., 238, and followed in many cases. The petition [790]*790Here, accompanied by bond as required, sufficiently raises issues of fact which are determinable only by the District Court. Hence, the judgment below is
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Crawford v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 216 N.C. 789 (N.C. 1939).
216 N.C. 789 (Crawford v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kerley v. Standard Oil Co.
31 S.E.2d 438 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1944)