Crawford v. Saul
Opinion
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION CIVIL CASE NO. 3:20-cv-00347-MR
ROSA CRAWFORD, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ORDER OF REMAND ) ANDREW SAUL, ) Commissioner of Social Security, ) ) Defendant. ) _______________________________ )
THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Defendant’s Consent Motion for Reversal and Remand [Doc. 17]. Sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) provides, in pertinent part, that “[t]he court shall have power to enter, upon the pleadings and transcript of the record, a judgment affirming, modifying, or reversing the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security, with or without remanding the cause for a rehearing.” The Defendant here has moved for reversal of the decision below and for a remand of this case for further administrative proceedings. For the reasons stated in the Defendant’s motion, the Court finds that remand is appropriate. See Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89 (1991). IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Defendant’s Consent Motion for Reversal and Remand [Doc. 17] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to sentence four of section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security is hereby REVERSED, and this case is hereby REMANDED for further administrative proceedings, consistent with this Order. The Clerk of Court shall enter a separate Judgment of Remand simultaneously herewith, thereby closing the case. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed: May 24, 2021
Martifi Reidinger ee Chief United States District Judge AS
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Crawford v. Saul (Crawford v. Saul) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.