Crawford v. Mayor of Hawkinsville

Supreme Court of Georgia

Crawford v. Mayor of Hawkinsville

35 S.E. 168, 110 Ga. 312, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 401

DecidedFebruary 27, 1900

StatusPublished

This text of 35 S.E. 168 (Crawford v. Mayor of Hawkinsville) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Crawford v. Mayor of Hawkinsville, 35 S.E. 168, 110 Ga. 312, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 401 (Ga. 1900).

Pincite

Opinion

Lewis, J.

Under the facts as disclosed by the record, it appears that the plaintiff in error was a “traveling salesman” within the meaning of theiact approved December 14, 1896 (Acts 1896, p. 36); and this case, therefore, falls within the principle ruled by this court in Kimmel v. Americus, 105 Ga. 694. It follows that the conviction was contrary to law, and that the court erred in not sustaining the certiorari.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lewis, J.

Under the facts as disclosed by the record, it appears that the plaintiff in error was a “traveling salesman” within the meaning of theiact approved December 14, 1896 (Acts 1896, p. 36); and this case, therefore, falls within the principle ruled by this court in Kimmel v. Americus, 105 Ga. 694. It follows that the conviction was contrary to law, and that the court erred in not sustaining the certiorari.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concurring.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

35 S.E. 168, 110 Ga. 312, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 401, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crawford-v-mayor-of-hawkinsville-ga-1900.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack