Crawford v. Kalamazoo Stove & Furnace Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Crawford v. Kalamazoo Stove & Furnace Co.

258 A.D. 937, 17 N.Y.S.2d 619, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7644

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 27, 1939

StatusPublished

This text of 258 A.D. 937 (Crawford v. Kalamazoo Stove & Furnace Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Crawford v. Kalamazoo Stove & Furnace Co., 258 A.D. 937, 17 N.Y.S.2d 619, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7644 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: The trial justice properly submitted for the determination of the jury the question of fact whether the alleged assault was committed by an agent of the defendant acting in furtherance of defendant’s business in an effort to retake a stove which concededly was then defendant’s property. We conclude that the jury’s verdict upon this question and all other questions of fact was in accord with the weight of evidence. All concur. (The judgment is for plaintiff in a civil action for assault. The order denies a motion for a new trial.) Present — Sears, P. J., Crosby, Lewis, Cunningham and Taylor, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: The trial justice properly submitted for the determination of the jury the question of fact whether the alleged assault was committed by an agent of the defendant acting in furtherance of defendant’s business in an effort to retake a stove which concededly was then defendant’s property. We conclude that the jury’s verdict upon this question and all other questions of fact was in accord with the weight of evidence. All concur. (The judgment is for plaintiff in a civil action for assault. The order denies a motion for a new trial.) Present — Sears, P. J., Crosby, Lewis, Cunningham and Taylor, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

258 A.D. 937, 17 N.Y.S.2d 619, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7644, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crawford-v-kalamazoo-stove-furnace-co-nyappdiv-1939.