Crawford v. Jones
24 Tex. 382
Opinion
It appears plainly from the face of the note, made a part of the petition, that the plaintiff in error did not [383]*383contract as principal, but as surety. It was error to dismiss as to the principal and take judgment against the surety. Judgment reversed and cause remanded.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Crawford v. Jones, 24 Tex. 382 (Tex. 1859).
24 Tex. 382 (Crawford v. Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Douthit v. Martin & Bro.
39 S.W. 944 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1897)
Sun Mutual Insurance v. George Seeligson & Co.
1 Tex. L. R. 869 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1883)