Crawford v. Jackson

126 S.E. 890, 33 Ga. App. 538, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 577
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 28, 1925
Docket15728
StatusPublished

This text of 126 S.E. 890 (Crawford v. Jackson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Crawford v. Jackson, 126 S.E. 890, 33 Ga. App. 538, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 577 (Ga. Ct. App. 1925).

Opinion

■Stephens, J.

The evidence authorized the inference that the clerk of the superior court inadvertently failed to enter the date of filing on the declaration in attachment, which was filed within the time allowed by law; and the court did not err in ordering the clerk to make a nunc pro tunc entry of the true date of filing" and in overruling the motion to dismiss the dec]aration in attachment.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins, P. J., and Bell, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
126 S.E. 890, 33 Ga. App. 538, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 577, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crawford-v-jackson-gactapp-1925.