Crawford v. Hyatt Regency

Missouri Court of Appeals

Crawford v. Hyatt Regency

859 S.W.2d 269, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1323, 1993 WL 317728

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 24, 1993·No. No. 62897·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Claimant appeals the Final Award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission denying his claim for worker’s compensation benefits. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the Commission are supported by competent and substantial evi[270]*270dence, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Claimant appeals the Final Award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission denying his claim for worker’s compensation benefits. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the Commission are supported by competent and substantial evi[270]*270dence, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Crawford v. Hyatt Regency, 859 S.W.2d 269, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1323, 1993 WL 317728 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

859 S.W.2d 269 (Crawford v. Hyatt Regency) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.