Crawford v. Hubbell

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Crawford v. Hubbell

89 F. 1, 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 3009

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

DecidedSeptember 13, 1898

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 89 F. 1 (Crawford v. Hubbell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Crawford v. Hubbell, 89 F. 1, 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 3009 (circtsdny 1898).

Pincite

Opinion

LACOMBE, Circuit Judge.

An analysis of the bill of .complaint shows conclusively that the real controversy tendered is whether or not tlie terms of the recent war revenue act require express companies 1o pay for the stamps to be affixed to the receipts they give, and forbid their exacting the price of such stamps from their customers, or whelh<r such act leaves the question who shall pay for the revenue stamp open between the parties. Manifestly, then, this is a cause ‘Arising under [a] law providing internal revenue.” U. S. Rev. St. § 629. It has been held in this court that the application of the section last quoted has not been modified, as to removed causes, by the acts of 1887 aud 18S8. Vinal v. Improvement Co., 34 Fed. 228. Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LACOMBE, Circuit Judge.

An analysis of the bill of .complaint shows conclusively that the real controversy tendered is whether or not tlie terms of the recent war revenue act require express companies 1o pay for the stamps to be affixed to the receipts they give, and forbid their exacting the price of such stamps from their customers, or whelh<r such act leaves the question who shall pay for the revenue stamp open between the parties. Manifestly, then, this is a cause ‘Arising under [a] law providing internal revenue.” U. S. Rev. St. § 629. It has been held in this court that the application of the section last quoted has not been modified, as to removed causes, by the acts of 1887 aud 18S8. Vinal v. Improvement Co., 34 Fed. 228. Motion denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

89 F. 1, 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 3009, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crawford-v-hubbell-circtsdny-1898.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack