Crawford v. GUARDIANSHIP OF CRAWFORD

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Crawford v. GUARDIANSHIP OF CRAWFORD

50 So. 3d 1240, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 570, 2011 WL 222175

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 26, 2011

Docket4D09-1361

StatusPublished

This text of 50 So. 3d 1240 (Crawford v. GUARDIANSHIP OF CRAWFORD) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Crawford v. GUARDIANSHIP OF CRAWFORD, 50 So. 3d 1240, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 570, 2011 WL 222175 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals an order on the Guardian ad Litem’s Petition for Permanent Guardianship and an order denying a motion to disqualify the circuit judge. The appeal of the order on permanent guardianship is untimely, having been filed nearly a year after entry of the order. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.110(b). We therefore dismiss the appeal from that order. We affirm the order denying disqualification. Although the appeal was timely as to this order, appellant has not raised any challenge to it in his brief. See Capital Motors of Orlando, Inc. v. Signature Automotive Group, Inc., 795 So.2d 1060 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001).

WARNER, POLEN and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals an order on the Guardian ad Litem’s Petition for Permanent Guardianship and an order denying a motion to disqualify the circuit judge. The appeal of the order on permanent guardianship is untimely, having been filed nearly a year after entry of the order. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.110(b). We therefore dismiss the appeal from that order. We affirm the order denying disqualification. Although the appeal was timely as to this order, appellant has not raised any challenge to it in his brief. See Capital Motors of Orlando, Inc. v. Signature Automotive Group, Inc., 795 So.2d 1060 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001).

WARNER, POLEN and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

50 So. 3d 1240, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 570, 2011 WL 222175, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crawford-v-guardianship-of-crawford-fladistctapp-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack