Crawford v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Crawford v. Goord

266 A.D.2d 287, 698 N.Y.S.2d 515, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11347

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 8, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 266 A.D.2d 287 (Crawford v. Goord) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Crawford v. Goord, 266 A.D.2d 287, 698 N.Y.S.2d 515, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11347 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Commissioner of the New York State Department of Correctional Services, dated September 23, 1998, which modified the penalty and confirmed a determination of the Deputy Superintendent of the Greenhaven Correctional Facility, dated August 4, 1998, made after a hearing, finding that the petitioner had violated institutional rules prohibiting, inter alia, the use of threats and violent conduct.

Adjudged that the determination as modified is confirmed and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the petitioner’s assertions, the determination that he had violated various institutional rules is supported by substantial evidence (see, Matter of Foster v Coughlin, 76 NY2d 964; People ex rel. Vega v Smith, 66 NY2d 130).

[288]*288The petitioner’s remaining contentions are without merit. Mangano, P. J., Ritter, Joy, McGinity and Smith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Commissioner of the New York State Department of Correctional Services, dated September 23, 1998, which modified the penalty and confirmed a determination of the Deputy Superintendent of the Greenhaven Correctional Facility, dated August 4, 1998, made after a hearing, finding that the petitioner had violated institutional rules prohibiting, inter alia, the use of threats and violent conduct.

Adjudged that the determination as modified is confirmed and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the petitioner’s assertions, the determination that he had violated various institutional rules is supported by substantial evidence (see, Matter of Foster v Coughlin, 76 NY2d 964; People ex rel. Vega v Smith, 66 NY2d 130).

[288]*288The petitioner’s remaining contentions are without merit. Mangano, P. J., Ritter, Joy, McGinity and Smith, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

266 A.D.2d 287, 698 N.Y.S.2d 515, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11347, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crawford-v-goord-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack