Crawford v. French

Texas Supreme Court

Crawford v. French

25 Tex. 436

DecidedOctober 15, 1860

StatusPublished

This text of 25 Tex. 436 (Crawford v. French) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Crawford v. French, 25 Tex. 436 (Tex. 1860).

Pincite

Opinion

Bell, J.

—We are of opinion that there is no error in the judgment. The three suits were properly consolidated. [437]*437The charge of the court is not complained of, nor do we perceive that it was liable to any objection. The case depended entirely upon the facts; and the most that can be said in behalf of the appellant is, that there was some conflict in the testimony. We think, however, that the verdict is well sustained by the evidence. We will waive any extended notice of the evidence, as it would be unprofitable to recite the facts in this opinion, there being no questions of law to discuss.

The judgment of the court below is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bell, J.

—We are of opinion that there is no error in the judgment. The three suits were properly consolidated. [437]*437The charge of the court is not complained of, nor do we perceive that it was liable to any objection. The case depended entirely upon the facts; and the most that can be said in behalf of the appellant is, that there was some conflict in the testimony. We think, however, that the verdict is well sustained by the evidence. We will waive any extended notice of the evidence, as it would be unprofitable to recite the facts in this opinion, there being no questions of law to discuss.

The judgment of the court below is

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

25 Tex. 436, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crawford-v-french-tex-1860.