Crawford v. Fogg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Crawford v. Fogg

63 A.D.2d 666, 405 N.Y.S.2d 415, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11546

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 8, 1978

StatusPublished

This text of 63 A.D.2d 666 (Crawford v. Fogg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Crawford v. Fogg, 63 A.D.2d 666, 405 N.Y.S.2d 415, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11546 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to compel the New York State Board of Parole to grant petitioner his release on parole, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated August 16, 1977, which denied the application. Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The Board of Parole considered not only the offenses giving rise to petitioner’s incarceration, but also his prior prison record and the "prior [667]*667court action of probation” (see Matter of Consilvio v New York State Bd. of Parole, 57 AD2d 955; Matter of Eckhart v Bombard, 59 AD2d 783). Hopkins, J. P., Latham, Damiani and Suozzi, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to compel the New York State Board of Parole to grant petitioner his release on parole, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated August 16, 1977, which denied the application. Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The Board of Parole considered not only the offenses giving rise to petitioner’s incarceration, but also his prior prison record and the "prior [667]*667court action of probation” (see Matter of Consilvio v New York State Bd. of Parole, 57 AD2d 955; Matter of Eckhart v Bombard, 59 AD2d 783). Hopkins, J. P., Latham, Damiani and Suozzi, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

63 A.D.2d 666, 405 N.Y.S.2d 415, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11546, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crawford-v-fogg-nyappdiv-1978.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack