Crawford v. Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC

CourtDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan
DecidedJanuary 10, 2024
Docket5:23-cv-13283
StatusUnknown

This text of Crawford v. Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC (Crawford v. Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Michigan primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Crawford v. Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC, (E.D. Mich. 2024).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

CHRISTOPHER CRAWFORD, JR.,

Plaintiff, No. 23-13283 v. Honorable Nancy G. Edmunds FIDELITY BROKERAGE SERVICES, LLC, and MICHAEL RALSTON,

Defendants. _______________________________________/

ORDER DISMISSING PLAINTIFF’S STATE LAW CLAIMS

Plaintiff Christopher Crawford, Jr. brings claims against Defendants Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC and Michael Ralston under Michigan common law (defamation and wrongful termination), Michigan’s Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act (“ELCRA”), and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act (“Title VII”). The Court has federal question jurisdiction over Plaintiff’s Title VII claims (Counts III and V), but Plaintiff’s common law and ELCRA claims (Counts I, II, IV, and VI) are based on state law. Because the parties in this case appear to be nondiverse, the Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the state law claims so as to avoid jury confusion. See 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(4); Moor v. Cty. of Alameda, 411 U.S. 693, 716 (1973); Padilla v. City of Saginaw, 867 F. Supp. 1309, 1315 (E.D. Mich. 1994). Thus, pursuant to § 1367(c), Plaintiff's state law claims are hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Court will retain jurisdiction over Plaintiff’s federal claims only. SO ORDERED. s/Nancy G. Edmunds Nancy G. Edmunds Dated: January 10, 2024 United States District Judge I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record on January 10, 2024, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

s/Lisa Bartlett Case Manager

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Moor v. County of Alameda
411 U.S. 693 (Supreme Court, 1973)
Padilla v. City of Saginaw
867 F. Supp. 1309 (E.D. Michigan, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Crawford v. Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crawford-v-fidelity-brokerage-services-llc-mied-2024.