Crawford v. Federal Bureau of Prisons

Fourth Circuit

Crawford v. Federal Bureau of Prisons

100 F. App'x 945

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 21, 2004·No. No. 04-6776·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Curtis E. Crawford appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his complaint filed under the Federal Torts Claim Act pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(l) (2000), for failure to state a claim and dismissing his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Crawford v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons, No. CA-04-218-2 (E.D. Va. Apr. 26, 2004; Apr. 30, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Curtis E. Crawford appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his complaint filed under the Federal Torts Claim Act pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(l) (2000), for failure to state a claim and dismissing his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Crawford v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons, No. CA-04-218-2 (E.D. Va. Apr. 26, 2004; Apr. 30, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Crawford v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, 100 F. App'x 945 (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

100 F. App'x 945 (Crawford v. Federal Bureau of Prisons) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related