Crawford v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
This text of 100 F. App'x 945 (Crawford v. Federal Bureau of Prisons) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Curtis E. Crawford appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his complaint filed under the Federal Torts Claim Act pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(l) (2000), for failure to state a claim and dismissing his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Crawford v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons, No. CA-04-218-2 (E.D. Va. Apr. 26, 2004; Apr. 30, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
100 F. App'x 945, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crawford-v-federal-bureau-of-prisons-ca4-2004.