Crawford v. Drew

CourtDistrict Court, District of Columbia
DecidedFebruary 8, 2011
DocketCivil Action No. 2011-0316
StatusPublished

This text of Crawford v. Drew (Crawford v. Drew) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Crawford v. Drew, (D.D.C. 2011).

Opinion

--------------------------- --_._----. ------- --------------- -- ---

FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FEB ~ 8 2011 FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Clerk, U.S. District & Bankruptcy Courts for the District of Columbia ) JAMES B. CRAWFORD, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 11 Oalti ) D.B. DREW, ) ) Respondent. ) --------------------------~) MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter comes before the Court upon review of petitioner's application for leave to

proceed in forma pauperis and pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The application will

be granted and the petition will be dismissed.

The instant petition is substantially similar to that filed in a prior habeas action, Crawford

y. Drew, No. 09-2447, 2009 WL 5173506 (D.D.C. Dec. 30,2009), and it, too, must be dismissed

because a motion in the Superior Court of the District of Columbia under D.C. Code. § 23-110 is

petitioner's means of challenging his conviction and sentence. See id. "The mere denial of relief

by the local court[] does not render the local remedy inadequate or ineffective." Id., 2009 WL

5173506, at *2 (citations omitted).

An Order consistent with this Memorandum Opinion is issued separately on this same

date.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Crawford v. Drew, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crawford-v-drew-dcd-2011.