Crawford v. Drew
This text of Crawford v. Drew (Crawford v. Drew) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
--------------------------- --_._----. ------- --------------- -- ---
FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FEB ~ 8 2011 FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Clerk, U.S. District & Bankruptcy Courts for the District of Columbia ) JAMES B. CRAWFORD, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 11 Oalti ) D.B. DREW, ) ) Respondent. ) --------------------------~) MEMORANDUM OPINION
This matter comes before the Court upon review of petitioner's application for leave to
proceed in forma pauperis and pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The application will
be granted and the petition will be dismissed.
The instant petition is substantially similar to that filed in a prior habeas action, Crawford
y. Drew, No. 09-2447, 2009 WL 5173506 (D.D.C. Dec. 30,2009), and it, too, must be dismissed
because a motion in the Superior Court of the District of Columbia under D.C. Code. § 23-110 is
petitioner's means of challenging his conviction and sentence. See id. "The mere denial of relief
by the local court[] does not render the local remedy inadequate or ineffective." Id., 2009 WL
5173506, at *2 (citations omitted).
An Order consistent with this Memorandum Opinion is issued separately on this same
date.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Crawford v. Drew, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crawford-v-drew-dcd-2011.