Crawford v. Director of Patuxent Institution

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Crawford v. Director of Patuxent Institution

205 A.2d 210, 236 Md. 659, 1964 Md. LEXIS 972

Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided December 7, 1964·No. App. No. 77·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In this application for leave to appeal from a determination of defective delinquency, the applicant raises no contentions that have not been passed on repeatedly by this Court. We find the evidence to be admissible and sufficient. Cf. Silvestri v. Director, 234 Md. 641. In so finding, we do not rely upon the report of his psychiatrist, not offered in evidence below but appearing in the record.

Application denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

In this application for leave to appeal from a determination of defective delinquency, the applicant raises no contentions that have not been passed on repeatedly by this Court. We find the evidence to be admissible and sufficient. Cf. Silvestri v. Director, 234 Md. 641. In so finding, we do not rely upon the report of his psychiatrist, not offered in evidence below but appearing in the record.

Application denied.

Crawford v. Director of Patuxent Institution, 205 A.2d 210, 236 Md. 659, 1964 Md. LEXIS 972 (Md. 1964).

Pincite

205 A.2d 210 (Crawford v. Director of Patuxent Institution) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related