Crawford v. Director of Patuxent Institution

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Crawford v. Director of Patuxent Institution

205 A.2d 210, 236 Md. 659, 1964 Md. LEXIS 972

CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland

DecidedDecember 7, 1964

DocketApp. No. 77

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 205 A.2d 210 (Crawford v. Director of Patuxent Institution) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Crawford v. Director of Patuxent Institution, 205 A.2d 210, 236 Md. 659, 1964 Md. LEXIS 972 (Md. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In this application for leave to appeal from a determination of defective delinquency, the applicant raises no contentions that have not been passed on repeatedly by this Court. We find the evidence to be admissible and sufficient. Cf. Silvestri v. Director, 234 Md. 641. In so finding, we do not rely upon the report of his psychiatrist, not offered in evidence below but appearing in the record.

Application denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

In this application for leave to appeal from a determination of defective delinquency, the applicant raises no contentions that have not been passed on repeatedly by this Court. We find the evidence to be admissible and sufficient. Cf. Silvestri v. Director, 234 Md. 641. In so finding, we do not rely upon the report of his psychiatrist, not offered in evidence below but appearing in the record.

Application denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

205 A.2d 210, 236 Md. 659, 1964 Md. LEXIS 972, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crawford-v-director-of-patuxent-institution-md-1964.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack