Crawford v. Crawford

Missouri Court of Appeals

Crawford v. Crawford

65 S.W.3d 580, 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 117, 2002 WL 104233

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Crawford v. Crawford. Read the opinion of the Court — 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 262 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 29, 2002·No. No. WD 59536·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Larry C. Crawford (“Husband”) appeals from the second amended judgment of the trial court dissolving his marriage to Brenda K. Crawford (“Wife”) and ordering him to pay Wife $97,670.67. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, that no error of law [581]*581appears, and that an opinion would have no precedential value.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Larry C. Crawford (“Husband”) appeals from the second amended judgment of the trial court dissolving his marriage to Brenda K. Crawford (“Wife”) and ordering him to pay Wife $97,670.67. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, that no error of law [581]*581appears, and that an opinion would have no precedential value.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Crawford v. Crawford, 65 S.W.3d 580, 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 117, 2002 WL 104233 (Mo. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

65 S.W.3d 580 (Crawford v. Crawford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.