Crawford v. Coil

69 Mo. 588
Supreme Court of Missouri·Decided April 15, 1879·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Hough, J.

This was an action by attachment instituted under the statute before a justice of the peace to recover rent due to plaintiff from defendant. The writ of attachment was levied upon the crops growing on the demised premises, and the plaintiff had judgment. On appeal to the circuit court the plaintiff’s suit was dismissed on the ground that under the statutes of this State the growing crop of a tenant is not subject to attachment by the landlord for rent due. The statute has been otherwise construed in Hubbard v. Moss, 65 Mo. 647, and that case is decisive of this. The judgment of the circuit court must, therefore, be reversed and the cause i’emanded.

All concur.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Crawford v. Coil, 69 Mo. 588 (Mo. 1879).

69 Mo. 588 (Crawford v. Coil) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State ex rel. City of St. Louis v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.
174 S.W. 73 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1914)
Wilson & Aull v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.
66 Mo. App. 388 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1896)