Crawford v. Al Smith Plumbing & Heating Service, Inc.
This text of 344 So. 2d 63 (Crawford v. Al Smith Plumbing & Heating Service, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Although other evidence might have supported a different result the medical evidence supports the trial judge’s conclusion that plaintiff, despite the many congenital and degenerative defects of his spine, was not totally and permanently disabled by his accident.
Dr. Byram on May 23, 1975 reported “there is no significant lasting disability at this time” and his deposition is consistent with that report.
Dr. Dunn on December 23, 1974 reported “I think he has recovered sufficiently to return to work”.
Dr. Ganucheau agreed with the description of his testimony as “due to the congenital defect Mr. Crawford is experiencing in the cervical and lumbar area you would preclude him from going back to the type of work he did before because of that type of congenital defect”.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
344 So. 2d 63, 1977 La. App. LEXIS 3615, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crawford-v-al-smith-plumbing-heating-service-inc-lactapp-1977.