Crawford v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company
265 S.E.2d 394
Opinion
Cohen Neal CRAWFORD
v.
AETNA CASUALTY & SURETY COMPANY and Michigan Tool Company, a Division of Ex-Cell-O Corporation.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Harris & Bumgardner, for plaintiff.
*395 Womble, Carlyle, Sandridge & Rice, for defendants.
Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. § 7A-31, 44 N.C.App. 368, 261 S.E.2d 25. Denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Crawford v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company, 265 S.E.2d 394 (N.C. 1980).
265 S.E.2d 394 (Crawford v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Crawford v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
261 S.E.2d 25 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1979)