Crawford v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company
265 S.E.2d 394
This text of 265 S.E.2d 394 (Crawford v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Crawford v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company, 265 S.E.2d 394 (N.C. 1980).
Opinion
Cohen Neal CRAWFORD
v.
AETNA CASUALTY & SURETY COMPANY and Michigan Tool Company, a Division of Ex-Cell-O Corporation.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Harris & Bumgardner, for plaintiff.
*395 Womble, Carlyle, Sandridge & Rice, for defendants.
Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. § 7A-31, 44 N.C.App. 368, 261 S.E.2d 25. Denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Crawford v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
261 S.E.2d 25 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1979)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
265 S.E.2d 394, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crawford-v-aetna-casualty-surety-company-nc-1980.