Crawford Mfg. Co. v. United States
50 F.2d 280, 72 Ct. Cl. 722, 9 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 1616, 1931 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 328, 1931 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) 9370, 1931 WL 1470
Opinion
See Atwater Kent Mfg. Co. v. United States, 62 Ct. Cl. 419; Advance Automobile Accessories Corp. v. United States, 66 Ct. Cl. 304; Borg & Beck Co. v. United States, 67 Ct. Cl. 242; Cuno Engineering Corp. v. United States, 43 F.(2d) 259, 70 Ct. Cl. 384, and Universal Battery Co. v. United States, 281 U. S. 580, 50 S. Ct. 422, 74 L. Ed. 1051.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Crawford Mfg. Co. v. United States, 50 F.2d 280, 72 Ct. Cl. 722, 9 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 1616, 1931 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 328, 1931 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) 9370, 1931 WL 1470 (cc 1931).
50 F.2d 280 (Crawford Mfg. Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Burruss Land & Lumber Co. v. United States
318 F. Supp. 360 (W.D. Virginia, 1970)
Keeton v. United States
141 F. Supp. 516 (E.D. Virginia, 1956)
Hirasuna v. McKenney
135 F. Supp. 897 (D. Hawaii, 1955)