Crawford Associates, Inc. v. Sgammato

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Crawford Associates, Inc. v. Sgammato

263 A.D. 739, 31 N.Y.S.2d 47, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4781

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 24, 1941

StatusPublished

This text of 263 A.D. 739 (Crawford Associates, Inc. v. Sgammato) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Crawford Associates, Inc. v. Sgammato, 263 A.D. 739, 31 N.Y.S.2d 47, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4781 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

— • In an action to recover installments of interest on a bonded indebtedness, order of the City Court of Mount Vernon striking out the answer and granting judgment to plaintiff, and the judgment entered thereon, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Johnston, Adel and Close, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., and Taylor, J., dissent and vote to reverse the order and judgment and to deny the motion on the ground that, “ where one contracts to pay a principal sum at a certain future time with interest, the interest prior to the maturity of the contract is payable by virtue of the contract, and thereafter as damages for the breach of the contract.” (O’Brien v. Young, 95 N. Y. 428, 429, cited in Title Guarantee & Trust Co. v. 2846 Briggs Ave., 283 id. 512, at p. 517.) Such damages do not constitute a debt capable of a distinct claim and may only be recovered with the principal. (Cutter v. Mayor, etc., of N. Y., 92 N. Y. 166; Moers v. Norske Handelsbank, 191 App. Div. 114.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— • In an action to recover installments of interest on a bonded indebtedness, order of the City Court of Mount Vernon striking out the answer and granting judgment to plaintiff, and the judgment entered thereon, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Johnston, Adel and Close, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., and Taylor, J., dissent and vote to reverse the order and judgment and to deny the motion on the ground that, “ where one contracts to pay a principal sum at a certain future time with interest, the interest prior to the maturity of the contract is payable by virtue of the contract, and thereafter as damages for the breach of the contract.” (O’Brien v. Young, 95 N. Y. 428, 429, cited in Title Guarantee & Trust Co. v. 2846 Briggs Ave., 283 id. 512, at p. 517.) Such damages do not constitute a debt capable of a distinct claim and may only be recovered with the principal. (Cutter v. Mayor, etc., of N. Y., 92 N. Y. 166; Moers v. Norske Handelsbank, 191 App. Div. 114.)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

263 A.D. 739, 31 N.Y.S.2d 47, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4781, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crawford-associates-inc-v-sgammato-nyappdiv-1941.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack