Crawford and Dexter v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Crawford and Dexter v. State

1912 OK CR 64, 119 P. 1129, 6 Okla. Crim. 718, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 272

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedJanuary 17, 1912

DocketNo. A-1036.

StatusPublished

This text of 1912 OK CR 64 (Crawford and Dexter v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Crawford and Dexter v. State, 1912 OK CR 64, 119 P. 1129, 6 Okla. Crim. 718, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 272 (Okla. Ct. App. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The Attorney General has filed a confession of error based upon the following instruction given by the trial court: “You are instructed that, when the state has proved beyond a reasonable doubt, as charged in the information, that the defendant had the *719 designated liquors in his possession, it is incumbent upon the defendant to show such liquors were a lawful purchase, and if you believe from all the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that he was in the possestion of the liquors, and the same were not a lawful purchase, you should convict the defendant.” The instruction, supra, does not state any rule of law applicable to the trial of the issues raised in this case. Let the judgment be reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The Attorney General has filed a confession of error based upon the following instruction given by the trial court: “You are instructed that, when the state has proved beyond a reasonable doubt, as charged in the information, that the defendant had the *719 designated liquors in his possession, it is incumbent upon the defendant to show such liquors were a lawful purchase, and if you believe from all the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that he was in the possestion of the liquors, and the same were not a lawful purchase, you should convict the defendant.” The instruction, supra, does not state any rule of law applicable to the trial of the issues raised in this case. Let the judgment be reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1912 OK CR 64, 119 P. 1129, 6 Okla. Crim. 718, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 272, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crawford-and-dexter-v-state-oklacrimapp-1912.