Crawfish Processors Alliance v. United States

2008 CIT 27
CourtUnited States Court of International Trade
DecidedMarch 5, 2008
DocketConsol. 02-00376
StatusPublished

This text of 2008 CIT 27 (Crawfish Processors Alliance v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of International Trade primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Crawfish Processors Alliance v. United States, 2008 CIT 27 (cit 2008).

Opinion

Slip Op. 08-27

UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE

BEFORE: Senior Judge Nicholas Tsoucalas ________________________________________ CRAWFISH PROCESSORS ALLIANCE; : LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF : AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY; : BOB ODOM, COMMISSIONER, : : Plaintiffs, : : v. : : UNITED STATES, : : Defendant, : : and : Consol. Court No. : 02-00376 HONTEX ENTERPRISES, INC., d/b/a : LOUISIANA PACKING COMPANY; : QINGDAO RIRONG FOODSTUFF CO., LTD. : and YANCHENG HAITENG AQUATIC : PRODUCTS & FOODS CO., LTD; : BO ASIA, INC., GRAND NOVA : INTERNATIONAL, INC., PACIFIC : COAST FISHERIES CORP., : FUJIAN PELAGIC FISHERY GROUP CO., : QINGDAO ZHENGRI SEAFOOD CO., LTD. : and YANGCHENG YAOU SEAFOOD CO., : : Defendant-Intervenors : and Plaintiffs. : ________________________________________:

JUDGMENT

Upon consideration of the Department of Commerce’s Final Remand Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand, filed with the Court on January 28, 2008 (“Final Results”), the Court finds that those remand results comply with the Court’s remand order in Crawfish Processors Alliance v. United States, 31 CIT __, Slip Op. 07-156 (October 30, 2007) insofar as they treat Fujian Pelagic Fishery Group Co. (“Fujian”) and Pacific Coast Fisheries Corp. (“Pacific Coast”) as affiliated parties pursuant to 19 U.S.C. § 1677(33)(E). Having done so, Department of Commerce recalculated Fujian’s dumping margin from 174.04% to 60.83% for the period September 1, 1999 through August 31, 2000, the period of review. No party objected to the Final Results. Therefore, it is hereby ORDERED that the Final Results are affirmed; and it is further

ORDERED that since all other issues have been decided, this case is dismissed.

SO ORDERED.

/s/ Nicholas Tsoucalas NICHOLAS TSOUCALAS SENIOR JUDGE

Dated: March 5, 2008 New York, New York

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Definitions; special rules
19 U.S.C. § 1677(33)(E)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2008 CIT 27, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crawfish-processors-alliance-v-united-states-cit-2008.