Cravey v. General Accident, Fire & Life Insurance

Supreme Court of Georgia

Cravey v. General Accident, Fire & Life Insurance

105 S.E.2d 504, 214 Ga. 460, 1958 Ga. LEXIS 458

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedOctober 10, 1958

Docket20191

StatusPublished

This text of 105 S.E.2d 504 (Cravey v. General Accident, Fire & Life Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cravey v. General Accident, Fire & Life Insurance, 105 S.E.2d 504, 214 Ga. 460, 1958 Ga. LEXIS 458 (Ga. 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

Almand, Justice.

This case is a companion case to the cases numbered 20188, 20189 -and 20190, ante, the only difference between those cases and this case being that this equitable action was brought in -the names of the insurance companies rather than in the names of the rating organizations. All the rulings made in the aforementioned three cases, other than the ruling in division one of the opinion in those cases, are applicable and controlling in this case. It follows that the trial court did not err in overruling the general demurrers of the defendant Commissioner to the petitions of the plaintiffs, nor err in sus[461]*461taining special demurrers of the plaintiffs to specified paragraphs of the defendant’s answer.

Argued September 10, 1958 Decided October 10, 1958. Eugene Cook, Attorney-General, John L. York, F. Douglas King, Assistant Attorneys-General, John Tye Ferguson, Deputy Assistant Attorney-General, for plaintiff in error. Gambrell, Harlan, Bussell, Moye ■& Richardson, James C. Hill, E. Smythe Gambrell, Robert R. Richardson, Edward W. Killorin, contra.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Almand, Justice.

This case is a companion case to the cases numbered 20188, 20189 -and 20190, ante, the only difference between those cases and this case being that this equitable action was brought in -the names of the insurance companies rather than in the names of the rating organizations. All the rulings made in the aforementioned three cases, other than the ruling in division one of the opinion in those cases, are applicable and controlling in this case. It follows that the trial court did not err in overruling the general demurrers of the defendant Commissioner to the petitions of the plaintiffs, nor err in sus[461]*461taining special demurrers of the plaintiffs to specified paragraphs of the defendant’s answer.

Argued September 10, 1958 Decided October 10, 1958. Eugene Cook, Attorney-General, John L. York, F. Douglas King, Assistant Attorneys-General, John Tye Ferguson, Deputy Assistant Attorney-General, for plaintiff in error. Gambrell, Harlan, Bussell, Moye ■& Richardson, James C. Hill, E. Smythe Gambrell, Robert R. Richardson, Edward W. Killorin, contra.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

105 S.E.2d 504, 214 Ga. 460, 1958 Ga. LEXIS 458, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cravey-v-general-accident-fire-life-insurance-ga-1958.