Craver v. Christian

21 N.W. 716, 32 Minn. 525, 1884 Minn. LEXIS 224
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedDecember 10, 1884
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 21 N.W. 716 (Craver v. Christian) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Craver v. Christian, 21 N.W. 716, 32 Minn. 525, 1884 Minn. LEXIS 224 (Mich. 1884).

Opinion

By the Court.

The question upon this appeal is whether the trial court erred in dismissing the action upon the ground that the evidence was not such as to entitle plaintiff to have it submitted to the jury.. The settled case does not purport to contain all the evidence, and defendant insists that for this reason this court cannot properly consider the question stated. We can see no way to escape this conclusion. The appeal seems to stand upon the same footing as an appeal from an order refusing a new trial, moved for on the ground that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the verdict, when the settled case-does not show that it contains all the evidence. In such a state of the record we have often held that the question of insufficiency of evidence cannot be considered.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Boright v. Springfield Fire & Marine Insurance
25 N.W. 796 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1885)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
21 N.W. 716, 32 Minn. 525, 1884 Minn. LEXIS 224, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/craver-v-christian-minn-1884.