Cravens v. Bryant
3 Ala. 278
Opinion
In this case, the defendant pleaded a plea in. abatement of the suit, to which the. plaintiff below demurred-, and the Court sustained the demurrer, and rendered judgment for the debt. This was erroneous- If a verdict had been found against the defendant on an issue in fact, upon the plea, a final judgment should have been rendered for the plaintiff; but if the-plaintiff prevails on a demurrer to such a plea, the judgment is not final, but interlocutory only — that the defendant answer-over.
Let the judgment be reversed, and the cause remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cravens v. Bryant, 3 Ala. 278 (Ala. 1842).
3 Ala. 278 (Cravens v. Bryant) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Stowell v. Hooper
116 A. 256 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1922)