Craven v. Sun Bank, N.A.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Craven v. Sun Bank, N.A.

611 So. 2d 115, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 1225, 18 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 345

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 22, 1993

DocketNo. 91-2506

StatusPublished

This text of 611 So. 2d 115 (Craven v. Sun Bank, N.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Craven v. Sun Bank, N.A., 611 So. 2d 115, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 1225, 18 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 345 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We find no merit in appellant’s contentions on appeal except that appellant, individually, was entitled to assert a claim against appellee, Burnett, for fraud. Nevertheless, based on our review of the record, including appellant’s own extensive deposition testimony, we conclude the lower court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of Burnett on the fraud claim was correct.

AFFIRMED.

COBB, PETERSON and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We find no merit in appellant’s contentions on appeal except that appellant, individually, was entitled to assert a claim against appellee, Burnett, for fraud. Nevertheless, based on our review of the record, including appellant’s own extensive deposition testimony, we conclude the lower court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of Burnett on the fraud claim was correct.

AFFIRMED.

COBB, PETERSON and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

611 So. 2d 115, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 1225, 18 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 345, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/craven-v-sun-bank-na-fladistctapp-1993.